Hait Family Law

Child Travel Disputes in Israel: When One Parent Objects to Overseas Trips

Children at airport terminal

Family Court Approves Bar Mitzvah Travel Despite Father’s Fears

In a recent case highlighting child travel disputes in Israel, the Family Court approved a mother’s request to take her 13-year-old son abroad for his Bar Mitzvah—despite the father’s strong objections and fears of parental abduction.

The ruling emphasizes the court’s focus on children’s best interests and the need for flexibility and trust between divorced parents.


The Case: Can Divorced Parents Take a Child Abroad?

Child travel disputes are common when divorced parents disagree over overseas trips. In this case, the parents share custody of their 13-year-old son. When the mother wanted to take him and her current husband on a special Bar Mitzvah trip to Italy and Spain, the father refused to give his consent.

The father claimed:

  • The mother lacks strong ties to Israel.
  • She has family abroad and might abduct the child.
  • He requested that the court cancel the trip, shorten its duration, or demand financial security to guarantee the child’s return.

The Mother’s Position: Our Lives Are in Israel

The mother reassured the court that:

  • Her home, job, and family are firmly rooted in Israel.
  • She had no intention of fleeing or relocating.
  • The Bar Mitzvah trip was important for their son—a milestone and a memory he had long anticipated.

Notably, she had never objected when the father took their son abroad in the past.


The Court’s Decision: No Evidence of Real Risk

The Family Court in Israel rejected the father’s objection, pointing out:

  • The father failed to provide any concrete evidence that the mother would abduct the child.
  • He did not specify which relatives she supposedly had abroad or where they lived.
  • The mother’s history of cooperation—allowing him to take the child on trips—worked in her favour.

The judge emphasized that blocking the mother’s trip would undermine her parental role and the child’s right to meaningful experiences with both parents.


What About Parenting Time?

The father argued that the trip would interfere with his parenting schedule. The court acknowledged this but described the disruption as minimal and specific. The judge allowed for make-up time to balance the missed days.


Final Outcome: Travel Approved

The court ordered:
✅ The travel ban on the child to be lifted.
✅ The child’s passport to be handed over to the mother.
✅ The 11-day Bar Mitzvah trip to proceed as planned.


Key Takeaway: Child Travel Disputes in Israel Require Balance and Trust

This case is a reminder that child travel disputes in Israel often come down to:

  • The need for trust between divorced parents.
  • The court’s focus on the child’s welfare and shared experiences.
  • The understanding that fear alone is not enough to override parenting rights when no real danger is proven.

Looking for more guidance on divorce, child custody, or co-parenting in Israel? Visit our Free Divorce eBook Library—a collection of easy-to-read resources designed to help you navigate the legal, emotional, and practical challenges of separation.

👉Looking for more guidance on divorce, child custody, or co-parenting in Israel? Visit our Free Divorce eBook Library—a collection of easy-to-read resources designed to help you navigate the legal, emotional, and practical challenges of separation.

👉 Explore the Divorce eBook Library and take the next step toward protecting your future with knowledge and confidence.

sign up

just text for testing

Thank you for spending the time to fill out our form for your case assesment

This is probably a difficult time for you and I’m sure you have many questions. I promise to get back to you shortly.