[Israel] 077-200-8161
Call Us Now
Email Us Now
Divorce can be a highly emotional process, often leading both parties to blame each other for the marriage’s failure. In Israeli divorces between Jewish spouses, fault is considered within the Rabbinic court, applying Halachic (Jewish law) principles. However, in practical terms, such as financial settlements and child custody, fault has minimal influence. This article explores the concept of fault in Israeli divorce cases, explaining its legal implications and its impact on divorce outcomes.
The Legal Landscape:
In the civil Family court, fault is generally irrelevant in asset division. Israeli civil law holds that a person’s behavior should not affect their ownership of assets. The court’s main objective is to ensure a fair and equitable distribution of property between the divorcing parties.
Child custody and support matters prioritize the best interests of the child(ren). Regardless of fault, the courts strive to determine custody arrangements that provide a safe, stable, and nurturing environment for the children involved. Similarly, child support obligations are based on the child’s needs and the parents’ financial capacities.
The Changing Landscape:
Previously, Rabbinic courts in Israel sometimes favored one party, often women, by allocating fault, resulting in an unequal division of assets. For instance, in cases of adultery, the courts may have favored the faithful spouse with a larger share of assets. However, the Supreme Court has intervened and reversed such rulings, advocating for a fair and equal division of assets in line with modern legal principles.
Appealing Fault-Based Rulings:
If one party is assigned fault in the Rabbinic court, leading to an unfavorable outcome, it is possible to appeal the decision. However, it’s important to note that such instances are relatively rare. The appealing party must demonstrate that the fault-based ruling was unjust or improperly influenced the court’s decision.
Fault and Child Custody:
While the best interests of the child should be the main consideration in custody cases, the Rabbinic courts may consider the spouses’ behavior when making custody determinations. For example, if one party has engaged in adultery, the court may take it into account when balancing the best interests of the child(ren). However, this doesn’t automatically mean a decision against the offending party. The court assesses the overall circumstances and the ability of each parent to provide a nurturing environment.
In Israeli divorce cases, fault plays a limited role in financial matters, particularly in the civil Family court, where fairness and equitable asset distribution are emphasized. The primary focus in both the Rabbinic and civil courts is the best interests of the child(ren), ensuring their well-being and stability after divorce. Seeking professional guidance and understanding the legal landscape are essential for those navigating the complexities of divorce in Israel.
*Remember, you are not alone. There are resources and support available to help you. Please reach out for help.
We are here to help and advise you. Contact me at 0733743094 or jay.hait@orcheidin.co.il
Find out more on my
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@JayHaitAdv
and on my website: https://jayhaitlaw.com/
